When my book By No Means Equal was being prepared for print the publisher emailed me to say that certain passages contained what he called "problematic concepts involving unsubstantiated derogatory claims aimed at targeted groups (women, people of colour, et al.)" which contravened their editorial policy, and that they wouldn't publish unless I removed them. The specific passages concerned nothing more offensive than there being fundamental differences between men and women but I had to provide justification for statements I had made on that score. I watered my remarks down a little as a result and didn't object to doing so as the general point remained. But what really swung the argument in my favour and persuaded them to keep the rewritten section was an addition I made pointing out that differences between the two sexes are clearly signposted in astrology. Astrology seemingly helped me in this matter where everyday observation and common sense could not.
So, here I want to examine how astrology supports the traditional view of masculine and feminine while contradicting the modern attitude that the two sexes are so-called social constructs which are essentially interchangeable. As we shall see, and as everyone knew until recently, there is a profound difference between them and it goes right back to the duality necessary for manifestation.
Astrology is not primarily a predictive tool nor a system that describes psychological patterns though it is both of those. Its real power is as a symbolic description of how the universe works and that is how I will be looking at it here. At root, it is built upon a system of polarity and shows the primal cosmic duality required to differentiate and bring a universe into being. The two forces involved are opposite and complementary and in their most basic form they might be conceived of as the expanding and contracting energies of creation.
In the architecture of the zodiac, the 360-degree wheel is divided by alternating currents of charge. This is the law of polarity which is what lies behind sexual difference in human beings and everywhere else.
First, there is the masculine principle of Fire and Air. This is the initiating and expanding force which moves outward from the centre, the source of the One Life, projecting energy, ideas, light and impulse into space. It is the archetype of the seed, the spark and the active intellect. It is God’s initiating impulse and his first movement away from the still core of being. In terms of the constellations of astrology it is represented by Aries, Gemini, Leo, Libra, Sagittarius and Aquarius.
But this force must be balanced or it could never settle into form. Therefore, we have a complementary principle which follows on from the first as its opposite which means the first comes first just as Adam came before Eve.
In astrology the feminine principle relates to Earth and Water, capitalised because these are metaphysical realities of which the physical elements are simply correspondences in the lower world of base matter. Its constellations are Taurus, Cancer, Virgo, Scorpio, Capricorn and Pisces. This principle is the contracting and receptive force. It moves inward toward the centre, drawing energy in, containing it, incubating it and providing the matrix required for the idea to take form. It is the archetype of the soil, the womb and the deep waters. It is the reaction to the action. Without it the first action would never be grounded or limited and would simply be an endless explosion with nothing being formed.
Creation cannot take place if these forces are treated as like one another. If you have only expanding energy (Fire/Air), you have a chaotic explosion that can never form a body. If you have only contracting energy (Earth/Water), you have a static, inert mass that can never stir into life. Creation requires the tension of their difference but for any growth or development to take place, the first principle must drive the process and there must be a slight imbalance in that direction. Harmony does not mean equality or perfect symmetrical balance as it might in a purely mechanistic universe. If the second principle dominates there is retraction and collapse to the base state of chaos, but if the first does by just the right amount, then there is ordered growth.
Traditional astrology supports the view that the sexes, based on the cosmic principles they embody, are complementary, possessing equal spiritual value but having different functions. The masculine principle initiates the law and projects the vision above the horizon, the day part of the horoscope, while the feminine principle grounds the form and stabilises the energies below the horizon, the night part. The irony of feminism, which is the attempt to flatten this duality and declare the two forces essentially identical or interchangeable, is that it undermines the unique power of the receptive principle. It tries to force the contracting, incubating watery element to behave like a projecting fire-spark and by so doing so destroys the harmonious balance that is required to ground spiritual force from the higher planes.
For order to prevail in the material world, the active impulse must precede the receptive form. This can be expressed by a metaphysical law which states that expansion must occur before contraction can give it boundary. If there is no initial outward projection, which means no vision, no law and no igniting spark, then the feminine force has nothing to contract around and will remain a vacuum. Always in the sequence of manifestation, the expanding masculine force comes first and the feminine responds to that.
This response has traditionally been expressed in terms of submission and while, from the standpoint of metaphysics, it true that the feminine impulse must submit to the masculine, this submission is not a purely passive thing. It acts as the necessary wall of containment and resistance and so has its own strength and power. You might say the vessel must be strong enough to contain the burst of fiery energy and hold it in a stable and coherent form.
Disorder and chaos follow if the polarities switch roles. This is what tradition knew and what the modern world has forgotten. If the contracting force tries to behave like an initiating spark or if the expanding force refuses to lead and collapses into passivity, the whole edifice and structure of being fails.
If the form-building force tries to act as the primary explorer or initiator without a higher guiding vision, it builds structures that are rigid, stagnant and devoid of life.
Conversely, if the masculine spark does not first project and then maintain the law, the created space becomes disorganised and chaotic. Harmony prevails only when the active and receptive forces are faithful to their nature.
I'm talking about this in terms of energies and forces as though it were simply a matter of cold, impersonal mechanics, but that is to make a point. I suspect that behind these forces there are actual beings, angels perhaps, and that the root reality of man and woman really is Man and Woman.
To be continued.
.png)

.png)