Wednesday, 10 April 2019

The Sense of Smell (and the other senses)

What is the sense that most stimulates spiritual impression? It probably differs from person to person. Some may best respond to sight with the beauty of a sunset at one end of the spectrum and some distortion of modern art at the other. Some to sound with a Bach prelude or piece of Renaissance polyphony set against the cacophony of rap. I would not argue with anyone who put forward either of these. But for me the sense of smell has the power to be the most spiritually evocative. The scents of certain flowers and plants can summon up the intimation of higher worlds like nothing else while I find the smell (and taste, closely linked, of course) of garlic very unpleasant. But then it has a high sulphur content and sulphur has long been associated with hell! It is interesting, however, to note that orthodox Brahmins do not eat garlic, believing it to stimulate the evil passions such as anger as well as sexual desire. Furthermore, the Buddha had this to say in the Surangama Sutra.

"Ananda, all beings live if they eat wholesome food and die if they take poison. In their search for Samadhi, they should abstain from eating five kinds of pungent roots (i.e. garlic, the three kinds of onions and leeks); if eaten cooked, they are aphrodisiac and if raw, they cause irritability. Although those who eat them may read the twelve divisions of the Mahayana canon, they drive away seers in the ten directions who abhor the bad odour, and attract hungry ghosts who lick their lips. They are always surrounded by ghosts, and their good fortune will fade away day by day to their own detriment. When these eaters of pungent roots practise Samadhi, none of the Bodhisattvas, seers and good spirits come to protect them, while the mighty king of demons takes advantage of the occasion to appear as a Buddha as if to teach them the Dharma, defaming and breaking the precepts and praising carnality, anger and stupidity; at their death, they will join his retinue, and at the end of their time in his realm, they will fall into the unintermittent hell." 

If that's not enough to put you off garlic, I don't know what is. 

However we would do well to see it in context. It was directed to celibate monks spending long hours in meditation.  In that kind of life anything that stimulated the physical aspects of being would be regarded as detrimental. For us today there are surely other things that are much worse in terms of what we put into our bodies and minds. We have brought the means of spiritual obstruction to a high state of sophistication. That being said, there is still something about garlic that really does accentuate the material and eliminate the spiritual. Despite its health-giving properties, widely trumpeted by its acolytes, it is, in my opinion, an impure food from a spiritual perspective.

In English there are many words for smell, all having a slightly different nuance of meaning. Fragrance, scent, aroma, perfume, odour, stink, stench, and doubtless others I can't think of at the moment. This bears witness to the wide range of olfactory influences and effects, going from the heavenly to the hellish. I'm not sure that any of the four other senses can quite compete with that even if sight and hearing must be considered more important in that they open up a greater degree of experience. It is not hard to function normally without a sense of smell whereas to be blind or deaf is always a massive handicap. But, for me at least, certain smells have a quality that can evoke a world beyond this one more intensely than anything the other senses can offer.

Given that life follows similar patterns at different levels of its manifesting, it is interesting to speculate what the spiritual equivalents of the five senses might be. I don't mean such things as clairvoyance or clairaudience. Those are merely extensions of physical sight and hearing to a non-physical domain. I am thinking of how the counterparts of the senses might appear in the mind. For example, we have the word vision applied both to physical sight and intellectual perception. We also have foresight and insight. Taste can refer to the tongue or to artistic discrimination. Feeling is the physical sensation of touch but it is also an emotional thing. It is not so obvious what the spiritual counterparts to hearing and smell might be but could hearing relate to sensitivity to the Word of God and smell to a kind of discernment?

God has not left us without witnesses to his reality but the trouble is we are so used to them that we take them for granted and ignore the miracle of what they are. But just think for a moment how extraordinary the senses are. Imagine that you only had four and then woke up one day to find a fifth had appeared. What a magical new world it would open up. You would surely see it as indicating something much more profound about life and what it is than is offered by a materialistic metaphysics.

But now imagine how your experience will differ after physical death when you slough off the earthly body which is a wonderful vehicle while in this world but, being formed of physical matter, is also something that hinders, darkens and impedes spiritual consciousness. You are born anew. Everything is more intense, brighter, fresher, clearer, deeper. Layers of dirt and grease have been wiped off your senses. The feeling of always having to engage with life at one or several removes has gone. You are now completely in life with no barriers to experiencing it fully. The senses as we know them now will have been transfigured. At least, that will be the case for those who have not lived entirely through the senses while in this life.








Monday, 8 April 2019

Extremism

When the world turns to lies those who seek to uphold the truth will be branded extremists. They must be careful to be "extreme" in understanding only, not in behaviour. All the more so because the world will try to force them into that in order to justify itself.

https://albionawakening.blogspot.com/2019/04/extremism.html

Tuesday, 2 April 2019

Why believe in God if you are good? What does this belief add?

In the Sleepwalking to Emptiness post a comment by Tobias says "I try to talk about the spiritual realities to friends, but meet resistance all the way. They say that the point of life is to live it and not think about life after death because there might not be any, and if there is, then it will happen anyway. There is no knowledge of what is required to assure life after death, and when I try to explain, they say that they are good people, and if there is a God, and he cannot see that, then he is not worth bothering with. More than that, he is being unfair, and expecting too much of humanity in expecting them to acknowledge Christ."

Tobias' remark ties in with something else I was thinking about recently which was this.
If you don't believe in God but do believe in love and goodness, is there any real difference? Isn't that just believing in what is most essential about God anyway, and the supernatural element is not really so important?

The answer is that there is an enormous difference. But first of all, let me say this. If you don't believe in God then you don't really believe in love and goodness because without God these can have no real meaning. It is only a personal Creator that can give these things any kind of intrinsic living truth because they have to be grounded in something. Without such a being they are just nice ideas which it would seem to everyone's benefit to try to realise in life. But they are not objective realities that are fundamental to the universe. They cannot be without being centred in a Creator, a person, the Person. For these things are attributes of a person and cannot exist without a person. 

So, let's get this straight. If you don't believe in God then you don't believe in love and goodness except as abstractions. They are not really real.

But there is more. Even if what I have just written were not the case, it cannot be said that believing in love and goodness is enough without the belief in God. For two reasons. Firstly, because the love and goodness you believe in is then restricted to the material plane and to humanity as it is in this world. It will be directed to mortal men and women, and interpreted in the context of their mortal needs and desires. But love and goodness extend far beyond the mortal world and, in fact, to limit their operation to this world is to reduce them to mere shadows of what they actually are. They must be focused on a being's spiritual welfare; that is directed to the whole person not just to a truncated aspect of the whole which, if supported by love and the will to good to the detriment of the whole, will be given a false emphasis which will actually have an evil effect in that it will cut the person off from the higher aspects of his being which aspect represents his true and real self. Every parent knows that it is not love or goodness that allows a child to stuff itself with ice cream and cake until it is sick. This is the same principle.

The second reason that a belief in God is important is that this metaphysical action or thought (it's a mental action) opens up something within you which otherwise remains closed. As we have seen, if you believe in love but not God then you aren't really believing in love because love, to be real, must take its rise in the personal. The ultimate source of the personal can only be God. It is the reality of his person that makes love real. That and nothing else. If there is no person behind love then love is not real. So only those who believe in God really believe in love.

But a belief in God does more than this. It releases the mind from material bondage, allowing it to be sensitive to what is beyond itself. By believing in God, you open your heart and mind up to what is out there, beyond the purely material world. You actively begin to transform your very being to a higher state of consciousness. It's as though there is a curtain drawn across your mind, blocking out the light. When you draw that curtain, you allow the light to come in. Those who don't draw the curtain remain stuck in their little room, interpreting any ideas of love and goodness they might have merely from within the context of that room. Moreover, the fact is that their ideas about love are mostly inherited from those who have drawn the curtains anyway.

Being good, or what the world thinks of as good, is not of primary importance. What matters, spiritually speaking, is polarizing your being towards the real good, the real beautiful and the real true. It is detaching yourself from identification with your worldly self and realigning yourself with your spiritual being which is your true divine self. (The earthly self is not rejected but integrated with that divine self). When you die, you lose your body straightaway. But soon after that, if you would ascend to higher planes of being, you must detach yourself from your earthly personality too. The more you can do that now, the better off you will be then. In fact, it may well be that if you don't do it now, it will be very hard to do then. Your unbelief has surrounded you with a hard carapace of ignorance that encloses you in spiritual darkness.

Belief in God, proper belief of the heart and the mind, is saying yes to the universe. Disbelief, on the other hand, is the spirit of denial and refusal. It is the closing of the mind and the affirmation of self. Believing in God is like the blossoming of a flower. Unbelief is a bud that never opens.

The only real good is spiritual good because that is goodness in the whole. That means it is goodness as it relates to the entirety of what we are and not just a limited portion of it as material goodness does. And goodness (as love) in a material sense cannot be real because it has no true foundation. It is merely a conceptual thing, not a living reality that is fundamental to being itself for, in a purely material universe, consciousness and the self are constructs that break down to nothing. We can invest them with an imagined goodness but it is just projected out of thought. It is not real. Why believe in God if you are good? Because without God, no one is good. Jesus said that even of himself.