I read an interview recently with a comedian who had been through
extensive drug use, multiple sexual relations and the rest of the celebrity
lifestyle but had now supposedly rejected all that, settled down, married and
found 'spirituality'. What did he mean by spirituality? He thought that
traditional religion had been meeting a human need but there was too much
bigotry in it, too much sexism, too much emphasis on sin and not enough on
fulfilling human potential. He thought we were right to reject it on those
scores but that our descent into secularism and materialism was not the answer.
We needed a new big idea and, of course, he was going to provide it. He now
believed in a higher power which we needed to get in touch with in order to
find true meaning and fulfilment in our lives.
This sounds like the old story of the hedonist
who no longer finds any pleasure in his previous satisfactions so needs to look elsewhere to
find pleasure. He's not interested in spirituality because of a love of God or
a desire for truth. He's not concerned with real goodness. He's not
willing to sacrifice or serve or really submit to a true higher power. He wants
that higher power on his own terms and he wants it while staying resolutely
faithful to the values of this world which can't possibly be questioned. Spirit
has to accommodate itself to this world in his eyes. The notion that it should be
the other way round does not occur to him.
For so many people nowadays 'spirituality'
is a lifestyle choice which they want to add to their other worldly
possessions. It's an addition to their self image, adopted for purely egotistic
reasons. Tell them that it means you have to 'take up the cross' and, like the
rich young man, they will walk away. Tell them it means you must sacrifice and
renounce and they will look at you blankly. They want heaven while staying
firmly in this world. In my view they are further away from true spiritual
understanding than an honest materialist. I know that some might say that this
is a start but I don't agree. Truth is unlikely to grow from such rotten roots. This is just worldliness disguised as spirituality.
Does this comedian acknowledge the wisdom
of the 'archaic' Ten Commandments? Does he renounce the sins of the sexual revolution? Does he accept
the reality of evil and see its power in the world? I may be coming across as a
bit of a Bible thumper here but just as some old fashioned Protestant
religion could focus too much on sin and not enough on love so the modern
'spiritual but not religious' person focuses far too much on love, horizontally
understood (i.e. not love of God which is the only real basis for the other
kind), and not at all on sin unless that is understood as sins against worldly
values or political correctness as it is known these days. He sees spirituality
as something waiting there for him to take and make him feel happier as he is
now and does not understand that it is something that requires a radical
transformation on his part. He might be willing to engage in some kind of
technique to get what he wants but he doesn't see that techniques belong to
this world and can never get you beyond it. They might work on a physical or
psychological level. They can never work on a spiritual one.
The fact is that modern 'spirituality' has
no place for God, not the living God who is a Person, who has a will and a purpose. It might give him a token acknowledgement but he is not absolutely central, and
he must be if spirituality is to be real and not dissipate into
self-centredness and triviality. Yes, I know about Buddhism but the situation
in the modern West is so totally different to that in the ancient East that I
don't think it is applicable here. Besides, traditionally proper Buddhists were monks
and lived a life of sacrifice and renunciation which the spiritual but not
religious of today certainly do not do.
We must ask why God is persona non grata in so much spirituality of today, and the answer
clearly is that the acceptance of God would mean you had to acknowledge
something greater than yourself which was real, not vague like an unidentified
higher power. Something to which you had to incline yourself and give yourself up to, holding nothing back. You could not have spirituality as part of your own personality. You would have to sacrifice that personality in order to have spirituality. And this the narcissist of today is not prepared to do.
@William - Important point here. Even when I myself was a New Age kind of person, I assumed it was essentially a kind of 'technology' of this-worldly gratification; a way of making people feel-better about their mortal lives.
ReplyDeletethis is perhaps why New Age thinking always seems eventually to gravitate to one or another kind of 'healing'. For instance, I wrote the following before I became a Christian - it appeared in a 2008 book called Healing, Hype or Harm edited by Edzard Ernst
https://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/alternative-therapies.html
The problem with New Age spirituality as I see it is that it is basically self-centred. It's the response of a worldly person who wants the gifts of spirituality without renouncing their intrinsic worldliness. So you could say it relates to the psychic world but not the spiritual.
ReplyDeleteEssentially it wants spirituality without repentance.