Have you noticed that with
every year that goes by what were regarded as perfectly normal, indeed healthy,
attitudes are becoming tarred with the brush of extremism, and possessing them
is seen as the sign of a bad person? I am speaking of such things as love of
country, upholding the truth of the natural, proper recognition of the
difference between men and women, maintaining of spiritual values and
appreciation that some cultures really are better, in an objective sense, than
others. All these things would have been believed by every civilized, educated
person until relatively recently. Now, none of them are, or none of them are
supposed to be. They belong to the old, unenlightened, prejudiced age and must
be swept away in the light of the 'higher truth' that humanity is one, and
every single unit of it (except presumably the ones that don't believe this) is
fully equal to every other one.
In saying this I am obviously not denying that, spiritually
speaking, we are all valuable in the eyes of God, and, as growing souls, all
equally valuable. In the Christian understanding, a king has no more spiritual
worth than the lowest of his servants. He may have but that is not on account
of his crown. By the same token, the servant may be spiritually greater than the
king, and higher in the kingdom of heaven. In spiritual terms, we are all one
in Christ but only when we have all accepted Christ. Only when we have, in full
understanding and real contrition, repented of our worldly transgressions and turned
to God.
But the spiritual fact that we are all one in Christ does not
negate the fact that as souls we are all different (that's the whole point of
individuality which is the purpose of creation), and where there is difference
there is inequality. That is why the ancients depicted life as a chain of being
or a ladder. There is one ladder but it has many rungs stretching from Earth to
Heaven, and there are creatures on every rung, those at higher levels being
closer to God. Would you say the average sincere believer is spiritually
equivalent to a saint? Is a saint equivalent to Christ? Of course not (though
the potential to grow is always there), and yet they are all one in God.
The modern view is that it is wrong to love the local and the
particular unless, that is, the local and the particular is regarded as having
been oppressed in recent times. We are enjoined to love humanity rather than
particular expressions of it. But the reality of our nature is that we cannot
love the general without first loving the particular. Only he who loves
individual human beings, particular men and women, can really love humanity.
But if you love particular people then you value some more than others. You
cannot love everyone equally. Even Jesus had his favourite disciple.
Similarly with nations. The man who doesn't love his own country
cannot love anything. If you are a citizen of the world, you don't love
anything. You have an ideology, and ideologies are not built on love. They are
built on theory. Indeed, when you scratch beneath the surface you often find that
many modern ideologies are actually built on hatred. Hatred of truth and the good.
Resentment of the reality of God and the fact of Christ. I know that they are
not depicted like this and, quite probably, adherents of these ideologies would
not even recognize themselves in that description, but it becoming ever clearer
to me that those who reject spiritual truth do so because of an unacknowledged
hatred within themselves. Ultimately there are but two forces in the universe,
love and hate. Of course, ultimately there is only one which is love, but in
our fallen corner of it there is love and rejection of love, and love means
first and foremost love of God. If there is no love of God then there is
rejection of love even if the rejecter proclaims himself to be acting from
love, love of humanity being a prime candidate to justify the rejection of God.
But you cannot love humanity if you do not love God because the only source of
love is in God and if you have love within you then you must acknowledge the
higher power that is its source. If you don't acknowledge, as in recognize, the source of love
that means that what you are calling love is not the real thing but some
interpretation you have conjured up of it. I repeat. If you have love within
you then you must see the truth of God. If you don't see the truth of God then
you do not have proper love within you. God is love.
There is no general theme to this post. It's one of my occasional
efforts in which I just start writing with no clear idea of what I want to say
and see where I go. But if I were to extract a theme, it would
be this. We live in a world without love that pretends it acts from love. We
are utter fakes and will remain so until we rediscover the truth and reality of
God. There is no truth without God, no truth and no love. As long as we deny
him, we live a lie and we have no love. God is love and love is God. You cannot have one without the other.